USCIS Expected to Re-Implement the Public Charge Rule Soon, After Federal Appeals Court Stays Lower Court Injunction
September 14, 2020

At a Glance
- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled late Friday that a lower court did not have the authority to enjoin the Department of Homeland Security from enforcing its public charge regulation during the COVID-19 national emergency, pursuant to a recent Supreme Court decision.
- Though lawsuits against the DHS public charge rule are ongoing, the Supreme Court ruled that DHS may enforce the rule throughout the United States while those cases continue.
- USCIS is soon expected to resume requiring applicants for adjustment of status and nonimmigrant extensions and changes of status to comply with the regulation.
The issue
Following a recent Supreme Court decision, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit ruled that a federal district court did not have the authority to enjoin the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) from requiring applicants for adjustment of status and changes or extensions of nonimmigrant status to comply with 2019 public charge regulations. The case is New York et al. v. Department of Homeland Security.
The decision is the latest in a string of rulings concerning the public charge regulation. Most recently, on July 29, a New York federal district court barred DHS from enforcing the regulation during the COVID-19 national emergency; days later, the Second Circuit restricted the injunction to Connecticut, New York, and Vermont while the lawsuit continues. Shortly thereafter, DHS asked the Second Circuit to stay that limited injunction, arguing that the Supreme Court has allowed the agency to enforce the rule while challenges to it are litigated. Friday’s ruling is the result of that request.
The DHS public charge regulation is being challenged in several federal lawsuits; those lawsuits continue. Separately, an injunction that prohibits the State Department from enforcing its separate public charge regulation for foreign nationals applying for visas outside of the United States remains in place.
What this means for employers and foreign nationals
USCIS is expected to issue instructions requiring applicants and petitioners to comply with the public charge regulation when filing Form I-485 applications for adjustment of status and nonimmigrant applications to change or extend nonimmigrant status on Forms I-129 and I-539/I-539A. The agency is expected to resume requiring adjustment applicants to submit detailed personal and financial information on Form I-944, the declaration of self-sufficiency, unless otherwise exempt. The forthcoming USCIS instructions are also expected to provide information on public charge compliance for cases that were filed while the regulation was enjoined.
Fragomen is closely monitoring the status of the DHS public charge rule and will issue further client alerts as USCIS issues implementation instructions.
This alert is for informational purposes only. If you have any questions, please contact the immigration professional with whom you work at Fragomen.
Explore more at Fragomen
Blog post
Attorney María José Clarke explores Chile’s intensified immigration enforcement framework under President José Antonio Kast, examining new employer compliance obligations, work authorization rules for foreign nationals and the legal and financial consequences of unauthorized employment.
Media mentions
Senior Manager Jonathan Hill examines how the UK's new RAG rating system and stricter compliance metrics could shape universities' approaches to international student recruitment and sponsorship compliance.
Blog post
Knowledge Management Director Ana Sofia Walsh and Senior Client Engagement Manager Soraya Driessen examine the European Commission’s EU Inc. proposal and its potential to reshape corporate structures across the EU, highlighting the resulting complexities and unresolved questions for immigration, work authorization and cross-border workforce mobility.
Video
With less than two weeks until the first match of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, Senior Associate Jake Paul Minster outlines important visa and entry considerations for travelers planning to visit the US, Canada and Mexico.
Media mentions
Partner Ali Haider discussed how flexible residency pathways, strong infrastructure and access to healthcare are continuing to drive interest among retirees looking to relocate to the UAE.
Blog post
Partner K. Edward Raleigh analyzes how post‑midterm US business immigration will shift toward heightened enforcement, worker‑protection scrutiny and cross‑agency oversight, urging employers to align hiring practices, sponsorship decisions and documentation with consistent, defensible workforce strategies.
Media mentions
Awards
Fragomen is named “Law Firm of the Year” for Immigration Law by Best Law Firms™ - Australia and receives National and Regional Tier 1 rankings in Immigration Law.
Media mentions
Partner Parisa Karaahmet discusses the broad application of a USCIS memo to adjustment of status applicants and notes that H- and L-visa holders may have a somewhat easier burden in demonstrating factors that support favorable discretion.
Blog post
Senior Manager Alice Spaull and Associate Stephanie Fitton examine the evolving UK immigration and Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) requirements for athletes, their support teams and associated guests attending the Commonwealth Games 2026, highlighting key compliance risks and the importance of early travel planning.
Media mentions
Media mentions
Partner K. Edward Raleigh discusses a recent USCIS memo that appears to signal greater caution in how adjudicators assess adjustment of status cases rather than establishing a new legal standard.
Blog post
Attorney María José Clarke explores Chile’s intensified immigration enforcement framework under President José Antonio Kast, examining new employer compliance obligations, work authorization rules for foreign nationals and the legal and financial consequences of unauthorized employment.
Media mentions
Senior Manager Jonathan Hill examines how the UK's new RAG rating system and stricter compliance metrics could shape universities' approaches to international student recruitment and sponsorship compliance.
Blog post
Knowledge Management Director Ana Sofia Walsh and Senior Client Engagement Manager Soraya Driessen examine the European Commission’s EU Inc. proposal and its potential to reshape corporate structures across the EU, highlighting the resulting complexities and unresolved questions for immigration, work authorization and cross-border workforce mobility.
Video
With less than two weeks until the first match of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, Senior Associate Jake Paul Minster outlines important visa and entry considerations for travelers planning to visit the US, Canada and Mexico.
Media mentions
Partner Ali Haider discussed how flexible residency pathways, strong infrastructure and access to healthcare are continuing to drive interest among retirees looking to relocate to the UAE.
Blog post
Partner K. Edward Raleigh analyzes how post‑midterm US business immigration will shift toward heightened enforcement, worker‑protection scrutiny and cross‑agency oversight, urging employers to align hiring practices, sponsorship decisions and documentation with consistent, defensible workforce strategies.
Media mentions
Awards
Fragomen is named “Law Firm of the Year” for Immigration Law by Best Law Firms™ - Australia and receives National and Regional Tier 1 rankings in Immigration Law.
Media mentions
Partner Parisa Karaahmet discusses the broad application of a USCIS memo to adjustment of status applicants and notes that H- and L-visa holders may have a somewhat easier burden in demonstrating factors that support favorable discretion.
Blog post
Senior Manager Alice Spaull and Associate Stephanie Fitton examine the evolving UK immigration and Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) requirements for athletes, their support teams and associated guests attending the Commonwealth Games 2026, highlighting key compliance risks and the importance of early travel planning.
Media mentions
Media mentions
Partner K. Edward Raleigh discusses a recent USCIS memo that appears to signal greater caution in how adjudicators assess adjustment of status cases rather than establishing a new legal standard.
