• Insights

Ireland Act 1949 - Does it Protect Irish Nationals Living in the UK?

February 12, 2018

Country / Territory

  • United KingdomUnited Kingdom

Related offices

  • London

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related offices

  • London

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related offices

  • London

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

In its June 2017 policy paper, the UK government specifically advised Irish citizens that they do not need to take steps to protect their entitlements, and that a person living in Northern Ireland can choose to continue to hold an Irish passport only.

Irish citizens residing in the UK will not need to apply for settled status to protect their entitlements… We will continue to uphold in that context the rights of the people of Northern Ireland to be able to identify as British or Irish, or both, and to hold citizenship accordingly.

In an August 2017 position paper, the UK government again took the same stance, referencing the Ireland Act 1949.

The Ireland Act 1949 states that Ireland “is not a foreign country for the purposes of any law in force in any part of the United Kingdom”.  … As a result of these historic arrangements, the reciprocal rights for UK and Irish nationals include:… the right to enter and reside in each others’ state without being subject to a requirement to obtain permission…

Neither paper discloses the legal reasoning behind these assurances. So, is the UK government right?

Section 2(1) of the Ireland Act 1949 states as follows:

It is hereby declared that, notwithstanding that the Republic of Ireland is not part of His Majesty's dominions, the Republic of Ireland is not a foreign country for the purposes of any law in force in any part of the United Kingdom or in any colony, protectorate or United Kingdom trust territory, whether by virtue of a rule of law or of an Act of Parliament or any other enactment or instrument whatsoever, whether passed or made before or after the passing of this Act, and references in any Act of Parliament, other enactment or instrument whatsoever, whether passed or made before or after the passing of this Act, to foreigners, aliens, foreign countries, and foreign or foreign-built ships or aircraft shall be construed accordingly.

To interpret the statement that Ireland is ‘not a foreign country’ it is necessary to understand the legislative context.  The term ‘foreign country’ was used in the context of British nationality legislation and in then-prevailing immigration legislation.  In the British Nationality Act of 1948 the term “foreign country” referred to any country other than the UK or a remaining UK territory, or a remaining Commonwealth country or the Republic of Ireland.  Various consequences flowed from the distinction.  For example, a person born within the UK and Colonies would become a citizen of the UK and Colonies (‘CUKC’) at birth unless their father possessed diplomatic immunity as an envoy of a foreign country.  Also, a person born outside the UK and Colonies whose father was a CUKC by descent only would not in general acquire CUKC status, but if they were born in a foreign country their birth could be registered at a UK consulate within 12 months of the birth (or later with permission of the Secretary of State) – the registration would cause them to acquire CUKC.  This route did not exist for those born in Commonwealth countries.

However, the legislation now underpinning UK immigration control simply does not make use of the concept of being a national of a foreign country.  The position is dealt with by sections 1(1) to 1(3) of the Immigration Act 1971.

It is those who in the Act are expressed to have right of abode who are to be free from immigration control.  The categories of people holding right of abode are set out in section 2 of the 1971 Act; as originally drafted this was to include certain categories of CUKCs (now mostly reclassified as British citizens) and Commonwealth citizens, but section 2 never made any use of the concept of “foreign country” at all.

Thus, the Ireland Act 1949 does not assist Irish nationals living in the UK.  Ireland is not a foreign country, but neither is any country listed in Schedule 3 of the 1981 Act, which includes any Commonwealth country.

What is the position then of Irish nationals living in the UK? Are they in the same position as other European nationals?

In fact, their position is unusual, but not for the reason stated by the UK government, or to the same extent.  The correct position based on section 1 of the 1971 Act is as follows.  Arrival in the UK on a local journey from within the Common Travel Area (‘CTA’) is not subject to immigration control and those who so arrive do not require leave (permission) to enter.  Arrival in the UK other than on a local journey from within the CTA is subject to control and those who so arrive do require leave unless they have right of abode, or are entitled to enter by virtue of an enforceable EU right.  This is because of section 1(3) of the Immigration Act 1971:

(3) Arrival in and departure from the United Kingdom on a local journey from or to any of the Islands (that is to say, the Channel Islands and Isle of Man) or the Republic of Ireland shall not be subject to control under this Act, nor shall a person require leave to enter the United Kingdom on so arriving, except in so far as any of those places is for any purpose excluded from this subsection under the powers conferred by this Act; and in this Act the United Kingdom and those places, or such of them as are not so excluded, are collectively referred to as “the common travel area”.

The general principle for entry to the UK via the CTA set out in section 1(3) is subject to the exceptions set out by order, currently in the Ireland Control Order 1972, however these do not apply to Irish citizens.  Thus, Irish citizens who enter the UK from within the CTA do not require leave and are not subject to control.  Irish citizens who enter the UK from other than within the CTA are currently able to do so as European citizens.  In practice, since EU law gives them an unqualified initial right of entry for three months, Irish citizens are not stamped in at the border, and it is likely that they are not aware of any restriction on their permitted period of stay.

The operation of the CTA under the 1971 Act, and lack of effect of the Ireland Act 1949, has hitherto been concealed, since Ireland and the UK have always been part of the European Community, now the European Union, together.  But from 29 March 2019 the situation must come to a head.

Current Home Office policy is that Irish nationals are treated as settled from the moment they take up residence:

Citizens of Ireland, whether exercising EEA free movement rights or not, are not normally subject to any form of immigration control on arrival in the UK because of Ireland’s inclusion in the Common Travel Area (section 1(3), of the Immigration Act 1971).  (European Economic Area (EEA) and Swiss nationals: free movement rights, version 17.0, 20 October 2017)

As Professor Bernard Ryan has commented in a 2016 pre-referendum paper (ILPA EU Referendum Position Papers – The implications of UK withdrawal for immigration policy and nationality law: Irish aspects, 18 May 2016), “the precise rationale for this generous regime is uncertain, however, with neither the common travel area nor the Ireland Act 1949 appearing sufficient as an explanation.”

The Home Office policy itself only refers us back to section 1(3) of the 1971 Act.  Clearly, a Home Office policy document, if founded on a legal mistake, simply cannot provide the proper legal protection.  A December 2017 paper prepared by Simon Cox of Doughty Street Chambers on behalf of the Traveller Movement sets out the implications of this in detail, including the impact on the Belfast Agreement (Brexit and Irish citizens in the UK: How to safeguard the rights of Irish citizens in an uncertain future, The Traveller Movement, 4 December 2017.)

There will be legislative opportunities to make the required amendments.  Primary immigration legislation will most likely be required prior to Brexit to implement the EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement. With the new immigration scheme for EU citizens scheduled to open to applicants on a voluntary basis from September 2018, it is hoped that the government will properly review the situation and take advantage of the time remaining before the UK leaves the EU to remediate the situation.

Country / Territory

  • United KingdomUnited Kingdom

Related offices

  • London

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related offices

  • London

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related offices

  • London

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Explore more at Fragomen

Fragomen news

Comment on DHS Proposal to Eliminate the 60-day Grace PeriodLearn more

Fragomen news

Comment on DHS proposal to impose up to $100,000 in Optional Practical Training FeesLearn more

Media mentions

Human Resources Director: Fixed-Term Contract Limits Squeeze Visa Sponsorship, Research Warns

Co-authors Partner Charles Johanes, Senior Counsel Anna Boucher and Allens Partner Tarsha Gavin explore the intersection of Australia’s migration and employment laws and the implications for employers sponsoring temporary visa holders.

Learn more

Media mentions

Prawo: Pracodawca na pierwszej linii: jak reforma zatrudniania cudzoziemców przesuwa odpowiedzialność na firmy

Partner Karolina Schiffter examines how Poland’s proposed foreign employment reforms could increase employers’ administrative and compliance responsibilities.

Learn more

Blog post

Trusted Digital Identity Is Critical Infrastructure for Global Mobility

In the first blog in a new series, Managing Director, Digital Identity Amit Sharma explores why trusted digital identity is becoming increasingly important to global mobility, how reusable digital credentials could work and why interoperability across systems and jurisdictions will be critical.

Learn more

Blog post

UK Global Talent Visa vs Innovator Founder Visa: A Guide for Tech Professionals, Researchers and Founders

Senior Associate Amelia Haynes compares the UK’s Global Talent and Innovator Founder visa routes, examining who each route may suit, the evidence required, professional flexibility and potential pathways to settlement.

Learn more

Blog post

Polish Citizenship by Descent: Finding Family Records and Navigating Polish Archives

Poland Immigration Strategy Director Tomasz Rogala and Senior Associate Tomasz Rdzanek explain how applicants pursuing Polish citizenship by descent can locate family records, navigate archives and obtain documentary evidence that can be used in citizenship proceedings.

Learn more
Generic Insights

Fragomen news

2026年10月 米国移民法ダイジェストLearn more

Awards

Fragomen Recognized in 2027 Best Law Firms® Rankings in the United States

Fragomen has been recognized in the 2027 edition of Best Law Firms®, earning a National Tier 1 ranking in Immigration Law and 16 regional rankings across the United States.

Learn more

Media mentions

Global Underwater Hub: The Specialist Skills Needed to Deliver Future Offshore Projects

Director Kelly Hardman explores how early UK immigration planning and investment in domestic skills can help offshore businesses access the specialist expertise needed to deliver future projects.

Learn more

Media mentions

SHRM: Why ‘Hush Trips’ Can Pose Big Risks for Employers and Workers

Senior Counsel Jo Antoons explains the immigration, social security, insurance, employment law and tax risks that undisclosed international remote work can create for employers.

Learn more

Media mentions

Times of India: Immigration After the Midterms: A New Congress, but Who Holds the Power?

Senior Counsel Mitch Wexler discusses the potential impact of the US midterm elections on immigration policy and the areas where bipartisan support could shape future developments.

Learn more

Fragomen news

Comment on DHS Proposal to Eliminate the 60-day Grace PeriodLearn more

Fragomen news

Comment on DHS proposal to impose up to $100,000 in Optional Practical Training FeesLearn more

Media mentions

Human Resources Director: Fixed-Term Contract Limits Squeeze Visa Sponsorship, Research Warns

Co-authors Partner Charles Johanes, Senior Counsel Anna Boucher and Allens Partner Tarsha Gavin explore the intersection of Australia’s migration and employment laws and the implications for employers sponsoring temporary visa holders.

Learn more

Media mentions

Prawo: Pracodawca na pierwszej linii: jak reforma zatrudniania cudzoziemców przesuwa odpowiedzialność na firmy

Partner Karolina Schiffter examines how Poland’s proposed foreign employment reforms could increase employers’ administrative and compliance responsibilities.

Learn more

Blog post

Trusted Digital Identity Is Critical Infrastructure for Global Mobility

In the first blog in a new series, Managing Director, Digital Identity Amit Sharma explores why trusted digital identity is becoming increasingly important to global mobility, how reusable digital credentials could work and why interoperability across systems and jurisdictions will be critical.

Learn more

Blog post

UK Global Talent Visa vs Innovator Founder Visa: A Guide for Tech Professionals, Researchers and Founders

Senior Associate Amelia Haynes compares the UK’s Global Talent and Innovator Founder visa routes, examining who each route may suit, the evidence required, professional flexibility and potential pathways to settlement.

Learn more

Blog post

Polish Citizenship by Descent: Finding Family Records and Navigating Polish Archives

Poland Immigration Strategy Director Tomasz Rogala and Senior Associate Tomasz Rdzanek explain how applicants pursuing Polish citizenship by descent can locate family records, navigate archives and obtain documentary evidence that can be used in citizenship proceedings.

Learn more
Generic Insights

Fragomen news

2026年10月 米国移民法ダイジェストLearn more

Awards

Fragomen Recognized in 2027 Best Law Firms® Rankings in the United States

Fragomen has been recognized in the 2027 edition of Best Law Firms®, earning a National Tier 1 ranking in Immigration Law and 16 regional rankings across the United States.

Learn more

Media mentions

Global Underwater Hub: The Specialist Skills Needed to Deliver Future Offshore Projects

Director Kelly Hardman explores how early UK immigration planning and investment in domestic skills can help offshore businesses access the specialist expertise needed to deliver future projects.

Learn more

Media mentions

SHRM: Why ‘Hush Trips’ Can Pose Big Risks for Employers and Workers

Senior Counsel Jo Antoons explains the immigration, social security, insurance, employment law and tax risks that undisclosed international remote work can create for employers.

Learn more

Media mentions

Times of India: Immigration After the Midterms: A New Congress, but Who Holds the Power?

Senior Counsel Mitch Wexler discusses the potential impact of the US midterm elections on immigration policy and the areas where bipartisan support could shape future developments.

Learn more
Fragomen.com home
Select Language
  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German

Select Language

  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German
ContactCareersMediaClient Portal
Search Fragomen.com
  • Our Services
    For EmployersFor IndividualsBy IndustryCase Studies
  • Our Tech & Innovation
  • Our People
  • Our Insights
    Worldwide Immigration Trends ReportsMagellan SeriesImmigration AlertsEventsMedia MentionsFragomen NewsBlogsPodcasts & Videos
  • Spotlights
    Travel and Mobility Considerations: Situation in the Middle EastNavigating Immigration Under the Second Trump AdministrationImmigration Matters: Your U.S. Compliance RoadmapCenter for Strategy and Applied InsightsView More
  • About Us
    About FragomenOfficesResponsible Business PracticesFirm GovernanceRecognition

Our Services

  • For Employers
  • For Individuals
  • By Industry
  • Case Studies

Our Tech & Innovation

  • Our Approach

Our People

  • Overview / Directory

Our Insights

  • Worldwide Immigration Trends Reports
  • Magellan Series
  • Immigration Alerts
  • Events
  • Media Mentions
  • Fragomen News
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts & Videos

Spotlights

  • Travel and Mobility Considerations: Situation in the Middle East
  • Navigating Immigration Under the Second Trump Administration
  • Immigration Matters: Your U.S. Compliance Roadmap
  • Center for Strategy and Applied Insights
  • View More

About Us

  • About Fragomen
  • Offices
  • Responsible Business Practices
  • Firm Governance
  • Recognition
Select Language
  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German

Select Language

  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German
ContactCareersMediaClient Portal
Important Updates
Important Updates
November 10, 2026 | Republic of the PhilippinesPhilippines: Changes to Streamline Alien Employment Permit Processing; But May Delay Applications During Transition Period
November 10, 2026 | CanadaCanada: Rural Communities Program Updates
November 10, 2026 | United StatesComment on DHS Proposal to Eliminate the 60-day Grace Period
November 10, 2026 | IndonesiaIndonesia: Scrutiny Increased for Indonesian Language Training Requirements for Foreign Workers
November 10, 2026 | New ZealandNew Zealand: Eligibility Tightened for Partnership-Based Visas
November 10, 2026 | Republic of the PhilippinesPhilippines: Changes to Streamline Alien Employment Permit Processing; But May Delay Applications During Transition Period
November 10, 2026 | CanadaCanada: Rural Communities Program Updates
November 10, 2026 | United StatesComment on DHS Proposal to Eliminate the 60-day Grace Period
November 10, 2026 | IndonesiaIndonesia: Scrutiny Increased for Indonesian Language Training Requirements for Foreign Workers
November 10, 2026 | New ZealandNew Zealand: Eligibility Tightened for Partnership-Based Visas
November 10, 2026 | Republic of the PhilippinesPhilippines: Changes to Streamline Alien Employment Permit Processing; But May Delay Applications During Transition Period
Subscribe

Stay in touch

Subscribe to receive our latest immigration alerts

Subscribe

Our firm

  • About
  • Careers
  • Firm Governance
  • Media Inquiries
  • Recognition

Information

  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal Notices
  • Privacy Policies
  • AI Transparency Statement
  • UK Regulatory Requirements

Our firm

  • About
  • Careers
  • Firm Governance
  • Media Inquiries
  • Recognition

Information

  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal Notices
  • Privacy Policies
  • AI Transparency Statement
  • UK Regulatory Requirements

Have a question?

Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • TikTok
  • Twitter

© 2026 Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP, Fragomen Global LLP and affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that the content made available on this site is not intended for visitors / customers located in the province of Quebec, and the information provided is not applicable to the Quebec market. To access relevant information that applies to the Quebec market, please click here.