United States: Federal District Court Temporarily Stays State Department Policy on Visa Applicants Engaged in Content Moderation Work

The District of Columbia federal district court has stayed one of the State Department policies related to social media and information, temporarily barring the agency from denying or revoking a visa based on a foreign national’s research, reporting, advocacy, or other work involving misinformation, disinformation, fact checking, content moderation, compliance, or trust and safety. The State Department policy, which had been described as an effort to combat perceived censorship, has been in effect since December 2025.

The district court ruled that the plaintiff, a technology research group, was likely to succeed on the merits of its claim that the policy violated the First Amendment. The court’s temporary stay was issued under the Administrative Procedure Act, and therefore, it is not limited to the parties to the lawsuit but rather applies to all visa applicants and visa holders who work or have worked in the relevant areas. While the stay is in place, these foreign nationals should not receive visa denials or revocations on the basis of their work.

The court order does not pause the online presence and social media content review applied to most nonimmigrant visa applicants, which remains in effect and has expanded to a broader range of nonimmigrant categories over recent months.

The case is Coalition for Independent Technology Research v. Marco Rubio et al., No. 1:26-cv-00815 (D.D.C., order issued July 14, 2026).

The State Department is expected to appeal the district court decision.