
At a Glance
- Effective immediately, visa nationals are no longer eligible for Hi-Tech (HIT) visas in Israel.
- As a result, visa nationals working for hi-tech companies who would normally apply for a HIT visa will have to apply under the traditional B-1 Foreign Expert visa path, which is a much lengthier process.
- Visa nationals with pending HIT visa applications will have their applications redirected and adjudicated under the lengthier B-1 Foreign Expert visa process.
- Visa nationals who currently hold HIT visas can remain on these visas for the duration of their validity but will not qualify for extensions under this category.
The situation
The Israeli Ministry of Interior has announced that visa nationals are no longer eligible for Hi-Tech (HIT) visas, effective immediately. Visa nationals are defined as nationals of countries that must apply for a B-2 visa prior to traveling to Israel for tourism or business.
Impact
- New applications. Visa nationals can no longer apply for HIT visas, effective November 5, 2019.
- Pending applications. The applications of visa nationals with pending HIT visa applications will be processed under the lengthier B-1 Foreign Expert visa category, which requires the completion of a new affidavit. Affected visa nationals and their employers should expect start date delays as a result of the longer process.
- Visa nationals holding HIT visas. Visa nationals who currently hold HIT visas can remain on these visas for the duration of their validity but will not qualify for extensions under this category.
- Spouses of visa nationals. Spouses of visa nationals traveling to Israel for work are no longer eligible for a new or extended spouse EAS B-1 work visa. Instead, spouses interested in working in Israel would be required to obtain their own B-1 Expert Visa based on their own eligibility and sponsored by their prospective employer.
- Alternate visa options. Visa nationals working for hi-tech companies who would normally apply for a HIT visa must apply under the traditional B-1 Foreign Expert visa path, which currently takes approximately two and a half months to process as compared to three to four weeks for the HIT visa process.
Background
This restriction comes after the government introduced a stricter application process for HIT visas and limited the types of companies eligible to participate in the program.
Looking ahead
Fragomen expects the Ministry of Interior to continue updating the process and eligibility for HIT visas as the program is tested in practice.
The results of the ongoing prime minister elections will determine any potential immigration policy changes. Fragomen will report related developments as needed.
Fragomen worked closely with Kan-Tor & Acco Law Firm to prepare this alert. This alert is for informational purposes only. If you have any questions, please contact the global immigration professional with whom you work at Fragomen or send an email to [email protected].
Explore more at Fragomen
Blog post
Attorney María José Clarke explores Chile’s intensified immigration enforcement framework under President José Antonio Kast, examining new employer compliance obligations, work authorization rules for foreign nationals and the legal and financial consequences of unauthorized employment.
Media mentions
Senior Manager Jonathan Hill examines how the UK's new RAG rating system and stricter compliance metrics could shape universities' approaches to international student recruitment and sponsorship compliance.
Blog post
Knowledge Management Director Ana Sofia Walsh and Senior Client Engagement Manager Soraya Driessen examine the European Commission’s EU Inc. proposal and its potential to reshape corporate structures across the EU, highlighting the resulting complexities and unresolved questions for immigration, work authorization and cross-border workforce mobility.
Video
With less than two weeks until the first match of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, Senior Associate Jake Paul Minster outlines important visa and entry considerations for travelers planning to visit the US, Canada and Mexico.
Media mentions
Partner Ali Haider discussed how flexible residency pathways, strong infrastructure and access to healthcare are continuing to drive interest among retirees looking to relocate to the UAE.
Blog post
Partner K. Edward Raleigh analyzes how post‑midterm US business immigration will shift toward heightened enforcement, worker‑protection scrutiny and cross‑agency oversight, urging employers to align hiring practices, sponsorship decisions and documentation with consistent, defensible workforce strategies.
Media mentions
Awards
Fragomen is named “Law Firm of the Year” for Immigration Law by Best Law Firms™ - Australia and receives National and Regional Tier 1 rankings in Immigration Law.
Media mentions
Partner Parisa Karaahmet discusses the broad application of a USCIS memo to adjustment of status applicants and notes that H- and L-visa holders may have a somewhat easier burden in demonstrating factors that support favorable discretion.
Blog post
Senior Manager Alice Spaull and Associate Stephanie Fitton examine the evolving UK immigration and Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) requirements for athletes, their support teams and associated guests attending the Commonwealth Games 2026, highlighting key compliance risks and the importance of early travel planning.
Media mentions
Media mentions
Partner K. Edward Raleigh discusses a recent USCIS memo that appears to signal greater caution in how adjudicators assess adjustment of status cases rather than establishing a new legal standard.
Blog post
Attorney María José Clarke explores Chile’s intensified immigration enforcement framework under President José Antonio Kast, examining new employer compliance obligations, work authorization rules for foreign nationals and the legal and financial consequences of unauthorized employment.
Media mentions
Senior Manager Jonathan Hill examines how the UK's new RAG rating system and stricter compliance metrics could shape universities' approaches to international student recruitment and sponsorship compliance.
Blog post
Knowledge Management Director Ana Sofia Walsh and Senior Client Engagement Manager Soraya Driessen examine the European Commission’s EU Inc. proposal and its potential to reshape corporate structures across the EU, highlighting the resulting complexities and unresolved questions for immigration, work authorization and cross-border workforce mobility.
Video
With less than two weeks until the first match of the 2026 FIFA World Cup, Senior Associate Jake Paul Minster outlines important visa and entry considerations for travelers planning to visit the US, Canada and Mexico.
Media mentions
Partner Ali Haider discussed how flexible residency pathways, strong infrastructure and access to healthcare are continuing to drive interest among retirees looking to relocate to the UAE.
Blog post
Partner K. Edward Raleigh analyzes how post‑midterm US business immigration will shift toward heightened enforcement, worker‑protection scrutiny and cross‑agency oversight, urging employers to align hiring practices, sponsorship decisions and documentation with consistent, defensible workforce strategies.
Media mentions
Awards
Fragomen is named “Law Firm of the Year” for Immigration Law by Best Law Firms™ - Australia and receives National and Regional Tier 1 rankings in Immigration Law.
Media mentions
Partner Parisa Karaahmet discusses the broad application of a USCIS memo to adjustment of status applicants and notes that H- and L-visa holders may have a somewhat easier burden in demonstrating factors that support favorable discretion.
Blog post
Senior Manager Alice Spaull and Associate Stephanie Fitton examine the evolving UK immigration and Electronic Travel Authorisation (ETA) requirements for athletes, their support teams and associated guests attending the Commonwealth Games 2026, highlighting key compliance risks and the importance of early travel planning.
Media mentions
Media mentions
Partner K. Edward Raleigh discusses a recent USCIS memo that appears to signal greater caution in how adjudicators assess adjustment of status cases rather than establishing a new legal standard.
