EU Court of Justice opens the door for host country to disregard Certificate of Coverage for Posted Workers
February 6, 2018

Countries / Territories
- 🌐
Related contacts

Client Engagement Director Europe
Related offices
Related contacts

Client Engagement Director Europe
Related offices
Related contacts

Client Engagement Director Europe
Related offices
By: Wim Cocquyt
Within the field of global mobility of personnel, social security costs are as significant as immigration compliance. Due to the changing European legal landscape for immigration as well as for the posting of workers, social security has grown in importance as companies strategically plan for personnel assignments.
The application for a certificate of social security coverage (commonly now known as a CoC, or an A1 certificate amongst all the countries that apply the EU Regulations on social security) has become fundamental not only for showing compliance with social security obligations for the period of a temporary secondment, but also for securing work permits and for guaranteeing compliance with posted worker notification requirements from Day 1. New categories of work permits offering the possibility to work in various EU countries at the same time, like the ICT permit, raise important social security challenges.
According to consistent case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union (‘CJEU’ or ‘the Court’), set out in the current European Regulations, a CoC should be considered binding, and therefore in principle does not allow the institutions of the host country to examine its validity.
The CJEU Judgment
Today the CJEU has replied to a very important request for a preliminary ruling from the Belgian Supreme Court, in respect of the scope of the binding nature of the E101 certificate (C-359/16).
In its ruling, the CJEU follows the opinion of the Advocate-General Saugmandsgaard Øe by stating that a court of the host country may disregard an E101 (or A1) certificate, formally issued in accordance with the provisions of the EU Regulations, by the competent institution of the home country, if that court finds that the certificate was obtained or invoked fraudulently.
In the current EU Regulations there is no definition of ‘fraud’ (yet). Anticipating an amendment of the Regulations, the CJEU suggests that fraud can be detected in cases where the applicant has the intention of concealing the fact that the objective conditions for requesting a CoC are not fulfilled. E.g. the condition that the employer continues to have an actual business in the home country.
The present ruling comes after yet another very important judgement of the CJEU of last year (C-620/15) in which the Court had re-confirmed its consolidated case-law by stating that a CoC is binding as long as the certificate has not been withdrawn or declared invalid by the authorities of the issuing Member State. This holds true even where it is found that the conditions under which the worker carries out his/her activities clearly do not fall within the material scope of the legal provision under which the certificate is issued.
Recalling the principles of cooperation and mutual trust between Member States, the CJEU’s decision today opens the door, for the first time, for the host country’s competent authorities to investigate the facts underlying the issuance of a CoC. If the home country fails to carry out a review of the certificate within a reasonable period of time in the light of evidence of fraud, and the certificate is not withdrawn or declared invalid by the home country, the host country will therefore be allowed to disregard the certificate. In practice, this will likely lead to retro-active applicability of host country social security, along with rather significant penalties.
Finally, considering another opinion of the same Advocate-General in a very recent pronouncement of January 31st, 2018, the CJEU may continue down the same road in the future in respect of other conditions that are fundamental for the issuance of a CoC, such as the fact that a posted worker cannot be sent in replacement of another posted worker.
How We Can Help
Although today’s judgment has to be viewed in light of the protests of many European countries in relation to ‘social dumping’ and the need to intervene in that respect, it will likely give rise to more investigative actions in respect of the CoC, from host country authorities.
Fragomen can assist your company with ensuring that A1 certificates are requested in accordance with the requirements of the EU Regulations, and make sure your company is compliant in both immigration and social security, from Day 1.
Countries / Territories
- 🌐
Related contacts

Client Engagement Director Europe
Related offices
Related contacts

Client Engagement Director Europe
Related offices
Related contacts

Client Engagement Director Europe
Related offices
Explore more at Fragomen
Media mentions
Partner K. Edward Raleigh explains that the Department of Labor’s Project Firewall expands H-1B oversight beyond individual complaints and increases the scope of employer compliance reviews.
Media mentions
UK Government Affairs Strategy Director Shuyeb Muquit examines how proposed settlement reforms could reshape the path to UK residency by extending qualifying periods and linking eligibility to individual contribution.
Podcast
Partner Cosmina Morariu and Business Immigration Manager Ayana Ibrahimi discuss critical immigration strategies underpinning healthcare-sector staffing in Canada, unpacking how recent policy, mobility and compliance developments are affecting employers and global talent pipelines.
Awards
Fragomen named Private Client Team of the Year at The British Legal Awards 2025, recognising the strength of our UK Private Client practice.
Media mentions
Partner Daniel Brown highlights rising deceptive practices in immigration and emphasizes stronger verification and compliance measures for employers.
Media mentions
Senior Manager Louise Senior highlights how proposed UK reforms could expand right to work checks across hospitality and reshape compliance for businesses.
Video
Rick Lamanna, Jake Paul Minster and Lunga Mani discuss Africa’s path to the 2026 World Cup.
Media mentions
Partner Louise Haycock notes that the UK’s new fast-track residency route for high earners could affect how businesses plan for immigration costs.
Blog post
Senior Manager Zaur Gasimov outlines Georgia’s stricter residence-permit requirements and enhanced monitoring measures introduced under the country’s 2025 immigration reforms.
Media mentions
Senior Manager Jonathan Hill explains why more UK universities are on UKVI student visa action plans and how extended timeframes help them address compliance issues.
Media mentions
Partner Karolina Schiffter explains why Poland has paused online residence permit bookings and returned to paper-based submissions.
Blog post
Senior Manager Ana Bessa Santos outlines Switzerland’s 2026 immigration quotas and what employers should expect across non-EU/EFTA, EU/EFTA and UK permit categories.
Media mentions
Partner K. Edward Raleigh explains that the Department of Labor’s Project Firewall expands H-1B oversight beyond individual complaints and increases the scope of employer compliance reviews.
Media mentions
UK Government Affairs Strategy Director Shuyeb Muquit examines how proposed settlement reforms could reshape the path to UK residency by extending qualifying periods and linking eligibility to individual contribution.
Podcast
Partner Cosmina Morariu and Business Immigration Manager Ayana Ibrahimi discuss critical immigration strategies underpinning healthcare-sector staffing in Canada, unpacking how recent policy, mobility and compliance developments are affecting employers and global talent pipelines.
Awards
Fragomen named Private Client Team of the Year at The British Legal Awards 2025, recognising the strength of our UK Private Client practice.
Media mentions
Partner Daniel Brown highlights rising deceptive practices in immigration and emphasizes stronger verification and compliance measures for employers.
Media mentions
Senior Manager Louise Senior highlights how proposed UK reforms could expand right to work checks across hospitality and reshape compliance for businesses.
Video
Rick Lamanna, Jake Paul Minster and Lunga Mani discuss Africa’s path to the 2026 World Cup.
Media mentions
Partner Louise Haycock notes that the UK’s new fast-track residency route for high earners could affect how businesses plan for immigration costs.
Blog post
Senior Manager Zaur Gasimov outlines Georgia’s stricter residence-permit requirements and enhanced monitoring measures introduced under the country’s 2025 immigration reforms.
Media mentions
Senior Manager Jonathan Hill explains why more UK universities are on UKVI student visa action plans and how extended timeframes help them address compliance issues.
Media mentions
Partner Karolina Schiffter explains why Poland has paused online residence permit bookings and returned to paper-based submissions.
Blog post
Senior Manager Ana Bessa Santos outlines Switzerland’s 2026 immigration quotas and what employers should expect across non-EU/EFTA, EU/EFTA and UK permit categories.
