Fragomen on Immigration: Fragomen Offices Get Busy Helping Unaccompanied Immigrant Children
September 8, 2014
Country / Territory
Related contacts
Share
As readers of this blog are well aware, the United States is facing an unprecedented refugee crisis at the U.S.-Mexico border, with the arrival of tens of thousands of unaccompanied children fleeing abuse and violence in Central America. Many of these children may be eligible for asylum or other immigration relief in the United States, but with no right to court-appointed counsel in immigration proceedings, and with a severe shortage of non-profit legal services organizations available to provide representation, the future is bleak for these children unless pro bono attorneys step in.
Last month, Austin Fragomen participated in a meeting at the White House, along with leaders of other major law firms, to discuss what the private sector can do to help. In response, the firm has rolled out a national pro bono initiative to provide representation to unaccompanied children who have been released to family members or into foster care in cities around the country.
The firm has selected Kids in Need of Defense (KIND) as its national partner in this endeavor. Regionally, each Fragomen office will also be working with trusted local non-profits. For example, the firm’s New York office is partnering with New York Law School’s Safe Passage Project to screen children who appear in Immigration Court and to represent individual children, and with the City Bar Justice Center to mentor two new Immigrant Justice Fellows who will be taking on a number of new cases. In Phoenix, the firm is working with the Florence Immigrant and Refugee Rights Project. In San Diego, the firm is working with the Casa Cornelia Law Center. Other partnerships between regional Fragomen offices and local non-profit organizations are in the making.
Immigration law is legendarily difficult to navigate without qualified legal assistance. We already face what Judge Robert A. Katzmann of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit has warned is an “immigrant representation crisis.” It is also well-established that immigrants who are represented by counsel are overwhelmingly more likely to prevail in removal proceedings than are those without counsel. As documented by the New York Immigrant Representation Study (NYIRS)—a pioneering study of the availability and adequacy of counsel in removal proceedings in New York—people facing removal in New York who have a lawyer are 500 percent more likely to win their cases than are those without representation.
