• Insights

Illinois Complicates E-Verify and I-9 Compliance for Employers

November 14, 2024

Illinois

Country / Territory

  • United StatesUnited States

Related contacts

Daniel Brown

Daniel Brown

Partner

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 380 1089

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Daniel Brown

Daniel Brown

Partner

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 380 1089

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Daniel Brown

Daniel Brown

Partner

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 380 1089

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

By: Daniel Brown

The state of Illinois has enacted Public Act 103-0879 (SB0508), which will take effect on January 1, 2025.  

The Act, as previously amended, had already placed several requirements on Illinois E-Verify employers beyond those required under the federal E-Verify program rules. The new amendments will impact all employers in Illinois and are meant to increase workers’ rights in connection with employment verification.  

The Act will require employee notification when questions arise regarding an employee’s eligibility to work or the validity of their documentation. The Act will also require employers to promptly notify the entire workforce in the event of an I-9 audit by the federal government. Illinois also will impose penalties for those employers found to have violated these requirements. 

Existing Requirements Under the Illinois Act 

Upon enrollment in the program, or within 30 days of the effective date for the Illinois Act for existing E-Verify users, employers must complete and maintain an Illinois Department of Labor (IDOL) form attesting, under penalty of perjury, that:  

  • the employer had received the E-Verify training materials from DHS; 
  • all employees who would administer the program have completed the DHS E-Verify computer-based tutorial training; and  
  • the mandatory DHS E-Verify and Department of Justice antidiscrimination posters have been posted in a prominent location visible to both existing and prospective employees.   

Employers must retain the original signed form, along with certificates of completion for the E-Verify training tutorial for all employees administering the program, and must make them available for inspection by IDOL. 

In addition, the statute provides that it is a violation of the Illinois Act for an employer to: 

  • fail to display the DHS and IER Notices required by E-Verify; 
  • allow an employee to use E-Verify without completing the required online tutorial; 
  • fail to take reasonable steps to prevent an employee from circumventing the requirement to complete the tutorial by using another employee’s log-in information; 
  • use E-Verify to prescreen candidates prior to hiring or completion of the I-9 form; 
  • terminate an employee or take any other adverse action prior to receiving a final non-confirmation notice from the E-Verify system; 
  • fail to notify an employee in writing, of a tentative non-confirmation notice, the right to contest the tentative non-confirmation, and the contact information for the relevant agency that the employee must contact to resolve the TNC notice; and 
  • fail to safeguard the information in the E-Verify system and means of access to the system such as usernames and passwords. 

New Requirements Taking Effect on January 1, 2025 

The new amendments taking effect at the beginning of the new year place new responsibilities on employers operating in Illinois, including imposing new employee notification requirements, and provides for additional potential penalties for employers failing to comply. Several of these notification requirements will apply to all employers, not just those enrolled in the E-Verify program. 

A new section 13 has been added to the Illinois Right to Privacy in the Workplace Act which provides the following new requirements. Employers are prohibited from imposing work authorization or reverification requirements greater than those required under federal law. 

Discrepancy with Employee Information

  • If an employer believes there is a discrepancy in an employee’s employment verification information, the employer must provide the employee with:  
  • the specific document or documents the employer deems insufficient, the reasons why the employer deems the documentation insufficient and, if requested by the employee or his or her authorized representative, the original document forming the basis for the insufficiency, within seven business days; 
  • Instructions on how the employee can correct the deficient document if required to do so by law; 
  • An explanation of an employee’s right to have representation present during related meetings or discussions with the employer; and  
  • An explanation of any other rights the employee might have. 

Notice from State or Federal Agency

  • When an employer receives notification from any federal or state agency, including (but not limited to) the Social Security Administration or the IRS about a discrepancy regarding an employee’s employment verification information, the employee is provided the following rights: 
  • The employer must not take any adverse action against the employee, including reverification, based upon receipt of the notification; 
  • The employer must provide notice to the employee (and potentially the employee’s collective bargaining representative) as soon as practicable but no later than five days after receipt; 
  • The notice to the employee must include at a minimum an explanation that the federal or state agency has notified the employer that the employee’s work authorization documents do not appear to be valid or to relate to the employee, and the timeframe the employee has to contest the determination with the federal agency, if possible; 
  • The employer must notify the employee in person and deliver the notification by hand, if possible. If hand delivery is not possible, the employer must notify the employee by mail and email, if the employee’s email address is known, and shall notify the employee’s collective bargaining representative, if any. 
  • Upon request, the employer shall provide the employee with the original notice from the state or federal agency regarding the discrepancy within seven business days. 
  • The employee may have a representative of his or her choice present for any meetings or discussion regarding the notification. 

Federal I-9 Inspection

  • In the event of a federal I-9 inspection (typically carried out by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement) employers must notify each employee by posting notice of the inspection of I-9 forms and other employment records in English and in any language commonly used in the workplace within 72 hours of the employer receiving notice of the Inspection. 
  • The posted notice must provide the name of the entity conducting the inspection of I-9 forms or other employment records, the date the employer received notice of the inspection, and the nature of the inspection to the extent known by the employer, and a copy of the notice received by the employer. 
  • Upon reasonable request, the employer must provide an employee a copy of the Notice of Inspection. 
  • The IDOL is directed to develop a template posting that employers can use to satisfy the requirement within six months. 

Notice of Suspect Documents

  • During the course of a federal I-9 inspection, if the inspecting agency notifies the employer that the documents provided by one or more employees do not establish that the employee(s) are authorized to work in the U.S., known as a Notice of Suspect Document, the employer must provide written notice to the employee within five business days unless a shorter time period is provided for under federal law or a collective bargaining agreement.  
  • The notice must relate to the employee only; 
  • The employer must notify the employee in person and deliver the notification by hand if possible.  If notice by hand is not possible then the employer shall notify the employee by mail and email, if the email address of the employee is known; 
  • The notice must provide, (1) an explanation that the inspecting agency has determined that the employee’s work authorization documents do not appear to be valid or reasonably relate to the employee, (2) the time period for the employee to notify the employer whether they are contesting the determination by the inspecting agency, (3) if known by the employer, the date and time of any meeting with the employer and employee or with the inspecting agency and the employee regarding the agency’s determination and (4) notice that the employee has the right representation during any meeting scheduled with the employer and the inspecting agency. 
  • If the employee contests the inspecting agency’s determination, the employer must also notify the employee within 72 hours after receipt of any final determination by the inspecting agency. 

The Illinois Act will be administered and enforced by the Director of the Illinois Department of Labor. Employees or applicants for employment who believe their rights under the Act have been violated can file a complaint with the IDOL.   

The department will investigate complaints and has the authority to issue search warrants and subpoenas for employer records. Employees can also commence actions in the circuit court to enforce the Illinois Act’s requirements where the IDOL has not taken action to address the violation.   

Where a violation is found, the circuit court can impose fines per each employee affected, plus costs, reasonable attorney’s fees and actual damages.   

For willful violations of the newly enacted section 13, which takes effect on January 1, the court can impose civil penalties ranging from $2,000 to $5,000 for a first violation per affected employee. 

Looking Ahead 

The new Illinois amendments will further complicate employer decisions when navigating potentially complicated questions about the validity of employee documentation and employment eligibility. Employers will need to incorporate these new Illinois requirements into their decision-making process when resolving these issues in the future.   

The Illinois Department of Labor has published an FAQ on its website regarding the Act, but it lacks detail, and many questions remain as to the precise scope of the new requirements and how they will be enforced going forward.   

With the expectation that the incoming administration will increase federal worksite enforcement efforts, Illinois employers who are subject to I-9 audits will need to be aware of these state requirements. 

Need to Know More? 

For further information and assistance with questions regarding compliance with the Illinois statute or I-9 compliance in general, please contact Partner Daniel Brown at [email protected].  

This blog was published on November 14, 2024, and due to the circumstances, there are frequent changes. To keep up to date with all the latest updates on global immigration, please subscribe to our alerts and follow us on LinkedIn, X, Facebook and Instagram. 

Country / Territory

  • United StatesUnited States

Related contacts

Daniel Brown

Daniel Brown

Partner

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 380 1089

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Daniel Brown

Daniel Brown

Partner

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 380 1089

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Daniel Brown

Daniel Brown

Partner

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 380 1089

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Explore more at Fragomen

Media mentions

Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel: Die Blaue Karte EU 2026

Partner Marius Tollenaere outlines the key 2026 EU Blue Card changes employers must understand to stay compliant and competitive.

Learn more

Media mentions

STV News: What Can Scots Fans Do if Their US Travel Permits Have Been Revoked?

Partner Charlotte Slocombe explained options available to Scotland fans whose US ESTAs have been denied or revoked ahead of the FIFA World Cup.

Learn more

Media mentions

Arabian Gulf Business Insight: Corporate Relocations to the Gulf Retain Appeal

Partner Abeer Al Husseini discusses evolving corporate relocation strategies and sustained demand for moves to the Gulf.

Learn more

Blog post

Business Immigration After the Midterms (Part 3): Four Scenarios and What Employers Should Do Now

Partner K. Edward Raleigh analyzes post‑midterm business immigration risks in Part 3 of this blog series, outlining four possible election outcomes and the practical steps employers should take to prepare for increased enforcement and scrutiny.

Learn more

Media mentions

People Management: Can the Government Stop Overseas Employees Visiting the UK?

Partner Natasha Catterson explains how the UK ETA scheme is changing business travel by requiring pre-travel digital approval for many visa-exempt visitors.

Learn more

Media mentions

The PIE: Trump’s $100,000 H-1B Fee Ruled Unlawful

Partner K. Edward Raleigh discusses the recent H-1B fee ruling and the potential for further appeals.

Learn more

Media mentions

Bloomberg Law: Congress’ Taxing Power Key to Trump Loss on $100,000 H-1B Fee

Partner Bo Cooper discussed a federal court decision vacating the $100,000 H-1B fee and noted that further legal proceedings are likely to shape the policy’s future.

Learn more

Blog post

Separating Fact and Fiction: Debunking Myths in German Immigration Law

Manager Adela Schmidt examines common misconceptions in German immigration law, including EU Blue Card mobility, short-term work permissions, residence permit extensions and communication with immigration authorities.

Learn more

Media mentions

Arbeit und Arbeitsrecht: § 45c AufenthG – Gut gemeint, aber lückenhaft?

Frankfurt Managing Partner Axel Boysen examines Germany's new Section 45c requirements and highlights key compliance considerations for employers recruiting talent from abroad.

Learn more

Video

Mexico Entry Requirements for the 2026 FIFA World Cup | #MobilityMinute

Senior Manager Sergio Flores discusses key immigration and travel considerations for individuals planning to visit Mexico during the FIFA World Cup 2026™, including visa waiver status, passport validity, FMM documentation and potential work-related visa requirements.

Learn more

Media mentions

PitchBook: Trump’s $100K H-1B Fee Was Meant to Slow Foreign Tech Hiring. It May Not Be Working.

Partner Audrea Golding discusses how top-funded startups may have greater flexibility in managing H-1B costs amid evolving hiring dynamics.

Learn more

Video

Swiss Naturalization: Understanding the Framework | #MobilityMinute

Manager Mihaela Dumitru discusses the Swiss citizenship process, including the authorities involved, key naturalization routes and why early planning is important.

Learn more

Media mentions

Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel: Die Blaue Karte EU 2026

Partner Marius Tollenaere outlines the key 2026 EU Blue Card changes employers must understand to stay compliant and competitive.

Learn more

Media mentions

STV News: What Can Scots Fans Do if Their US Travel Permits Have Been Revoked?

Partner Charlotte Slocombe explained options available to Scotland fans whose US ESTAs have been denied or revoked ahead of the FIFA World Cup.

Learn more

Media mentions

Arabian Gulf Business Insight: Corporate Relocations to the Gulf Retain Appeal

Partner Abeer Al Husseini discusses evolving corporate relocation strategies and sustained demand for moves to the Gulf.

Learn more

Blog post

Business Immigration After the Midterms (Part 3): Four Scenarios and What Employers Should Do Now

Partner K. Edward Raleigh analyzes post‑midterm business immigration risks in Part 3 of this blog series, outlining four possible election outcomes and the practical steps employers should take to prepare for increased enforcement and scrutiny.

Learn more

Media mentions

People Management: Can the Government Stop Overseas Employees Visiting the UK?

Partner Natasha Catterson explains how the UK ETA scheme is changing business travel by requiring pre-travel digital approval for many visa-exempt visitors.

Learn more

Media mentions

The PIE: Trump’s $100,000 H-1B Fee Ruled Unlawful

Partner K. Edward Raleigh discusses the recent H-1B fee ruling and the potential for further appeals.

Learn more

Media mentions

Bloomberg Law: Congress’ Taxing Power Key to Trump Loss on $100,000 H-1B Fee

Partner Bo Cooper discussed a federal court decision vacating the $100,000 H-1B fee and noted that further legal proceedings are likely to shape the policy’s future.

Learn more

Blog post

Separating Fact and Fiction: Debunking Myths in German Immigration Law

Manager Adela Schmidt examines common misconceptions in German immigration law, including EU Blue Card mobility, short-term work permissions, residence permit extensions and communication with immigration authorities.

Learn more

Media mentions

Arbeit und Arbeitsrecht: § 45c AufenthG – Gut gemeint, aber lückenhaft?

Frankfurt Managing Partner Axel Boysen examines Germany's new Section 45c requirements and highlights key compliance considerations for employers recruiting talent from abroad.

Learn more

Video

Mexico Entry Requirements for the 2026 FIFA World Cup | #MobilityMinute

Senior Manager Sergio Flores discusses key immigration and travel considerations for individuals planning to visit Mexico during the FIFA World Cup 2026™, including visa waiver status, passport validity, FMM documentation and potential work-related visa requirements.

Learn more

Media mentions

PitchBook: Trump’s $100K H-1B Fee Was Meant to Slow Foreign Tech Hiring. It May Not Be Working.

Partner Audrea Golding discusses how top-funded startups may have greater flexibility in managing H-1B costs amid evolving hiring dynamics.

Learn more

Video

Swiss Naturalization: Understanding the Framework | #MobilityMinute

Manager Mihaela Dumitru discusses the Swiss citizenship process, including the authorities involved, key naturalization routes and why early planning is important.

Learn more
Fragomen.com home
Select Language
  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German

Select Language

  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German
ContactCareersMediaClient Portal
Search Fragomen.com
  • Our Services
    For EmployersFor IndividualsBy IndustryCase Studies
  • Our Tech & Innovation
  • Our People
  • Our Insights
    Worldwide Immigration Trends ReportsMagellan SeriesImmigration AlertsEventsMedia MentionsFragomen NewsBlogsPodcasts & Videos
  • Spotlights
    Travel and Mobility Considerations: Situation in the Middle EastNavigating Immigration Under the Second Trump AdministrationImmigration Matters: Your U.S. Compliance RoadmapCenter for Strategy and Applied InsightsVietnamese ImmigrationView More
  • About Us
    About FragomenOfficesResponsible Business PracticesFirm GovernanceRecognition

Our Services

  • For Employers
  • For Individuals
  • By Industry
  • Case Studies

Our Tech & Innovation

  • Our Approach

Our People

  • Overview / Directory

Our Insights

  • Worldwide Immigration Trends Reports
  • Magellan Series
  • Immigration Alerts
  • Events
  • Media Mentions
  • Fragomen News
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts & Videos

Spotlights

  • Travel and Mobility Considerations: Situation in the Middle East
  • Navigating Immigration Under the Second Trump Administration
  • Immigration Matters: Your U.S. Compliance Roadmap
  • Center for Strategy and Applied Insights
  • Vietnamese Immigration
  • View More

About Us

  • About Fragomen
  • Offices
  • Responsible Business Practices
  • Firm Governance
  • Recognition
Select Language
  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German

Select Language

  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German
ContactCareersMediaClient Portal
Important Updates
Important Updates
June 11, 2026 | Republic of the PhilippinesPhilippines: Centralized Processing of Alien Employment Permits
June 12, 2026Malaysia: Foreign Knowledge Worker Projection Requests Reintroduced
June 11, 2026 | CanadaCanada: Quebec Experience Program for Permanent Residence to Reopen Temporarily
June 11, 2026 | GermanyDeutscher AnwaltSpiegel: Die Blaue Karte EU 2026
June 11, 2026 | 🌐Middle East - The Latest News on Mobility and Travel Considerations
June 11, 2026 | Republic of the PhilippinesPhilippines: Centralized Processing of Alien Employment Permits
June 12, 2026Malaysia: Foreign Knowledge Worker Projection Requests Reintroduced
June 11, 2026 | CanadaCanada: Quebec Experience Program for Permanent Residence to Reopen Temporarily
June 11, 2026 | GermanyDeutscher AnwaltSpiegel: Die Blaue Karte EU 2026
June 11, 2026 | 🌐Middle East - The Latest News on Mobility and Travel Considerations
June 11, 2026 | Republic of the PhilippinesPhilippines: Centralized Processing of Alien Employment Permits
Subscribe

Stay in touch

Subscribe to receive our latest immigration alerts

Subscribe

Our firm

  • About
  • Careers
  • Firm Governance
  • Media Inquiries
  • Recognition

Information

  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal Notices
  • Privacy Policies
  • AI Transparency Statement
  • UK Regulatory Requirements

Our firm

  • About
  • Careers
  • Firm Governance
  • Media Inquiries
  • Recognition

Information

  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal Notices
  • Privacy Policies
  • AI Transparency Statement
  • UK Regulatory Requirements

Have a question?

Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • TikTok
  • Twitter

© 2026 Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP, Fragomen Global LLP and affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that the content made available on this site is not intended for visitors / customers located in the province of Quebec, and the information provided is not applicable to the Quebec market. To access relevant information that applies to the Quebec market, please click here.