Important Updates
Important Updates
February 26, 2026 | Hong Kong SARHong Kong SAR: Earlier Extension Filing Announced
February 28, 2026 | 🌐Middle East - The Latest News on Mobility and Travel Considerations
February 27, 2026 | JapanJapan: New Compliance Requirement for Dispatch and Employer of Record Visa Applications Forthcoming
February 27, 2026 | New ZealandNew Zealand: Median Wage Increased for AEVW Program and AEWV-linked Visas
February 27, 2026 | United StatesUnited States: Reminder – Premium Processing Fees Increase Effective March 1
February 26, 2026 | Hong Kong SARHong Kong SAR: Earlier Extension Filing Announced
February 28, 2026 | 🌐Middle East - The Latest News on Mobility and Travel Considerations
February 27, 2026 | JapanJapan: New Compliance Requirement for Dispatch and Employer of Record Visa Applications Forthcoming
February 27, 2026 | New ZealandNew Zealand: Median Wage Increased for AEVW Program and AEWV-linked Visas
February 27, 2026 | United StatesUnited States: Reminder – Premium Processing Fees Increase Effective March 1
February 26, 2026 | Hong Kong SARHong Kong SAR: Earlier Extension Filing Announced
Subscribe
Fragomen.com home
Select Language
  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German

Select Language

  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German
ContactCareersMediaClient Portal
Search Fragomen.com
  • Our Services
    For EmployersFor IndividualsBy IndustryCase Studies
  • Our Tech & Innovation
  • Our People
  • Our Insights
    Worldwide Immigration Trends ReportsMagellan SeriesImmigration AlertsEventsMedia MentionsFragomen NewsBlogsPodcasts & Videos
  • Spotlights
    Travel and Mobility Considerations: Situation in the Middle EastNavigating Immigration Under the Second Trump AdministrationImmigration Matters: Your U.S. Compliance RoadmapCenter for Strategy and Applied InsightsVietnamese ImmigrationView More
  • About Us
    About FragomenOfficesResponsible Business PracticesFirm GovernanceRecognition

Our Services

  • For Employers
  • For Individuals
  • By Industry
  • Case Studies

Our Tech & Innovation

  • Our Approach

Our People

  • Overview / Directory

Our Insights

  • Worldwide Immigration Trends Reports
  • Magellan Series
  • Immigration Alerts
  • Events
  • Media Mentions
  • Fragomen News
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts & Videos

Spotlights

  • Travel and Mobility Considerations: Situation in the Middle East
  • Navigating Immigration Under the Second Trump Administration
  • Immigration Matters: Your U.S. Compliance Roadmap
  • Center for Strategy and Applied Insights
  • Vietnamese Immigration
  • View More

About Us

  • About Fragomen
  • Offices
  • Responsible Business Practices
  • Firm Governance
  • Recognition
Select Language
  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German

Select Language

  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German
ContactCareersMediaClient Portal
  • Insights

New Policy for Military Families Sparks Debate and Confusion About U.S. Citizenship Laws

November 18, 2019

insight-news-default

Country / Territory

  • United StatesUnited States

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

In late August the Trump Administration announced it would no longer treat certain children born abroad to U.S. military personnel as “residing” in the United States, thus precluding them from acquiring U.S. citizenship automatically. The political firestorm that ensued revealed that many Americans misunderstand our citizenship laws, especially as they apply to children born outside the geographic limits of the United States and its territories.

This article examines the principal ways U.S. citizenship is acquired by birth in and outside of the United States. It also explains how children under 18 may attain citizenship after birth abroad, either automatically or by application, and how the government’s new policy impacts members of the military and their families. The process of naturalization for U.S. permanent residents over the age of 18, and the ways in which U.S. citizenship may be lost are outside the scope of this article.

Birth in the United States

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and, consequently, Section 301(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, (8 U.S.C. 1401(a)), provide that persons born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are U.S. citizens at birth. Through various acts of Congress, United States today refers to the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(38), as well as the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Public Law 94-241 蹒(c), March 24, 1976, effective Nov. 3, 1986. It also includes U.S. territorial waters and airspace. See 7 FAM 1114(b), 1115(b).

Virtually all individuals born the United States are subject to its jurisdiction and thus U.S. citizens at birth. There is a small number of foreign diplomatic officials accredited to the United States, the United Nations, and other international organizations, who are immune from U.S. jurisdiction. Where such immunity extends to the families of these foreign diplomatic officials, their children born in the United States generally are also immune from U.S. jurisdiction and are not citizens at birth. U.S. law does, however, accord these children the benefit of choosing to become U.S. permanent residents upon application and proof of continuous residence in the United States since birth, 8 CFR 101.3.

Birth Abroad

The Constitution does not specify how those born abroad may become U.S. citizens. Instead, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 of the Constitution delegates to Congress the responsibility to “establish a uniform rule of naturalization.”Since 1790 Congress has enacted numerous laws prescribing how U.S. citizenship may be acquired at or after birth abroad. Since these laws have generally repealed prior versions without retroactivity, evaluating a claim to citizenship requires an examination of the statute in effect at the time the claimant was born.

The current statutes prescribing who acquires U.S. citizenship upon birth abroad generally has been in effect since 1986. It provides that a child born abroad to two U.S. citizen parents is a U.S. citizen at birth so long as at least one of the parents resided in the United States before the child’s birth. If only one parent is a U.S. citizen, then that parent must have been physically present in the United States for at least five years, at least two of which are after the age of 14, prior to the child’s birth. The legal distinction between residence and physical presence is beyond the scope of this article other than to highlight that a difference exists; “residence”in the United States refers to a presence more significant and contextual than a mere physical or literal presence.

Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship After Birth Abroad Upon Residing in the United States

Children born abroad who are not U.S. citizens at birth will automatically acquire U.S. citizenship under 8 U.S.C. 1431, once they begin residing in the United States as U.S. permanent residents, provided they are under the age of 18 and in the legal and physical custody of at least one U.S. citizen parent. In this case, it is irrelevant whether the citizen parent was a U.S. citizen, or had resided or been physically present in the U.S., prior to the child’s birth. This commonly occurs when a parent with minor children naturalizes. For example:

Diego, a Mexican citizen, moves to the U.S. with his spouse and daughter, Maria, who is 11 years old. Diego has an H-1B visa and his family has H-4 visas. Diego’s U.S. employer sponsors him for U.S. permanent residency (the “green card”). The application is granted and Diego, his spouse, and Maria become U.S. permanent residents. Five years later, Diego and his spouse apply for naturalization and become U.S. citizens. Once the parents are granted citizenship, Maria, who is now 16 and residing with her parents, automatically becomes a U.S. citizen, since she is under 18. This occurs by operation of law; i.e., Maria need not apply for citizenship. The above scenario holds true even if only one of the parents chooses to naturalize, so long as Maria is living with the parent who has become a citizen.

Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship After Birth While Residing Abroad

Unlike children residing in the United States, children born and residing abroad with a U.S. citizen parent do not automatically become U.S. citizens unless the child acquires citizenship at birth. Rather, 8 U.S.C. 1433 permits a child’s U.S. citizen parent to file an application for citizenship on the child’s behalf if the citizen parent has been physically present in the United States for at least five years, at least two of which are after the age of 14. Here, physical presence does not need to have occurred prior to the child’s birth as it does when establishing citizenship at birth. While the application for citizenship may be made from abroad, the child must be in the United States to take an oath of allegiance before citizenship is granted.

Exceptions for Members of the Military and the Recent Change in Policy

The statute provides two important exceptions for members of the U.S. armed services stationed abroad. First, time the citizen parent is abroad under military orders counts as U.S. physical presence. Second, military children do not need to enter the U.S. to take the oath of allegiance; they may take the oath and be granted citizenship abroad.

In the past, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) policy conferred a third benefit to military families stationed abroad. It treated military children as if they were residing in the United States for purposes of acquiring U.S. citizenship, although no such concession appears in the statute. This permitted eligible military children to obtain U.S. citizenship automatically and obviated the need for a citizen parent to apply on their behalf or show prior periods of U.S. physical presence.

USCIS has ended that policy, applicable to children born abroad on or after Oct. 29, 2019. Members of the U.S. military stationed abroad whose children are not citizens at birth will now need to seek citizenship for their children by application and only after the parent has met the physical presence requirements.

The following example illustrates the impact in this change in policy:

Marta, a citizen of Chile and U.S. permanent resident, is employed by the U.S. Army and stationed in Germany. Marta meets and marries a German national and gives birth to a daughter, Greta. Since Greta is not born in the United States and neither of her parents are U.S. citizens, she is not a U.S. citizen at birth.

Marta subsequently naturalizes and becomes a U.S. citizen. Under prior USCIS policy, which treated military children born abroad as if they were residing in the United States, Greta would have automatically become a U.S. citizen, provided she was living with her mother.

Under current policy, however, Greta would not acquire U.S. citizenship automatically while living in Germany. While she would likely acquire it automatically upon the family’s return to the United States as U.S. residents, if Marta seeks U.S. citizenship for her daughter while residing in Germany, she will need to make an application on her behalf and may only do so once she—Marta—meets the physical presence requirements; i.e., has been physically present in the U.S., including time abroad on military orders, for at least five years, two of which are after the age of 14. Depending on when Marta came to the United States as a permanent resident, she will need to calculate the point at which she meets the five-year physical presence requirement and, as needed, how much longer she will need to accrue physical presence while serving in the military abroad before she can apply for citizenship on her daughter’s behalf.

It is unclear how many members of the military this change in policy will impact but whomever it impacts will face delay in obtaining citizenship, a new application process, and related administrative burden. Whether or not the government’s decision to reverse a long-standing policy and/or the opposition to the change is politically motivated, USCIS’s new policy position is firmly grounded in statute.

Read a brief summary of the article here. 

Reprinted with permission from the 11/14/19 edition of the “PUBLICATION”©2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved.

Further duplication without permission is prohibited. ALMReprints.com – 877-257-3382 - [email protected].

 

Country / Territory

  • United StatesUnited States

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Explore more at Fragomen

Blog post

Bringing the Indonesian Diaspora Home: Insights on the New Global Citizenship Program

Senior Business Immigration Consultant Ryaihanny Sahrom and Business Immigration Consultant II Fahimah Muhammad examine Indonesia’s newly launched Global Citizenship of Indonesia (GCI) program and its introduction of long-term and indefinite permanent residence pathways for members of the Indonesian diaspora.

Learn more

Media mentions

Times Higher Education: Chaos’ Expected as New Visa Compliance Rules Now Due in June

Senior Immigration Manager Jonathan Hill notes that tighter UK visa compliance rules and new rating measures create additional challenges for universities.

Learn more

Video

Brazil: Early Career Visa

Partner Diana Quintas outlines key early career visa pathways and practical considerations for employers and graduates navigating entry-level immigration options.

Learn more

Fragomen news

Canadian Lawyer Magazine: Fragomen, Immigration Firm, Adds Julie Lessard as Partner in Montréal

The Montreal office has added Partner Julie Lessard and Counsel Elsa Agostinho and Sophia Khanzadian to strengthen its immigration services.

Learn more

Blog post

Housing Market Dynamics in Saudi Arabia: Policy Changes, Rent Stabilization and Cost of Living Implications for Employers

Destination Services Director Christine Sperr examines how housing market reforms, rent stabilization measures and cost-of-living dynamics in Saudi Arabia are influencing workforce mobility, compensation planning and long-term settlement strategies under Vision 2030.

Learn more

Blog post

Under EU Review: Germany’s Visa Requirements Trigger Infringement Proceedings on Vander Elst Compliance

Manager Dr Adela Schmidt and Senior Associate Isabel Schnitzler analyse the European Commission’s infringement proceedings against Germany concerning its Vander Elst visa requirements for third-country nationals providing short-term cross-border services and explain why current compliance obligations remain unchanged.

Learn more

Blog post

Venezuela’s Energy Reset: Unlocking Opportunity, Managing Risk and Deploying Talent Strategically

Latin America & the Caribbean Managing Partner Leonor Echeverria, Senior Associates Sarah Blackmore and Sonya Cole and Senior Regional Knowledge Manager Laura Weingort examine renewed energy interest in Venezuela and outline key immigration pathways, procedural constraints and strategic considerations for compliant talent deployment.

Learn more

Media mentions

Global Mobility Lawyer: EU to Leverage Visas With New “Assertive Migration Diplomacy” Strategy

Senior Manager Andreia Ghimis highlights how the EU’s new migration strategy could create opportunities for employers while increasing compliance requirements.

Learn more

Awards

Spear's 500 Recognises Partner Julia Onslow-Cole

Partner Julia Onslow-Cole is recognised in the Spears 500 guide to leading private client advisers, reflecting her experience advising high-net-worth individuals, families and global businesses on complex UK and European immigration and mobility strategies.

Learn more

Media mentions

Arabian Gulf Business Insight: Saudi Business Visa Rejections Rise as Scrutiny Tightens

Partner Abeer Al Husseini discusses increased scrutiny of Saudi business visas in AGBI, highlighting stricter review of short-term entry used for operational work and the implications for regional employers.

Learn more

Awards

Doyle’s Guide 2026: Fragomen Leaders Recognized as Leading Immigration Lawyers

Australia and New Zealand Managing Partner  Teresa Liu, Partner Charles Johanes, Practice Leaders Hedvika and Leader Ben Lear and Senior Associate Hannah Scanlan are recognized in the 2026 edition of Doyle’s Guide as leading immigration practitioners in Australia.

Learn more

Awards

Fragomen Ranked Band 1 in the Chambers Global 2026 Guide

Fragomen is ranked Band 1 for Immigration: Business in the Chambers Global 2026 Guide, marking two decades of recognition since 2006. The firm is also the only firm ranked Band 1 in the Global: Multi-Jurisdictional Immigration category and receives additional individual recognitions in the USA: Business Immigration rankings.

Learn more

Blog post

Bringing the Indonesian Diaspora Home: Insights on the New Global Citizenship Program

Senior Business Immigration Consultant Ryaihanny Sahrom and Business Immigration Consultant II Fahimah Muhammad examine Indonesia’s newly launched Global Citizenship of Indonesia (GCI) program and its introduction of long-term and indefinite permanent residence pathways for members of the Indonesian diaspora.

Learn more

Media mentions

Times Higher Education: Chaos’ Expected as New Visa Compliance Rules Now Due in June

Senior Immigration Manager Jonathan Hill notes that tighter UK visa compliance rules and new rating measures create additional challenges for universities.

Learn more

Video

Brazil: Early Career Visa

Partner Diana Quintas outlines key early career visa pathways and practical considerations for employers and graduates navigating entry-level immigration options.

Learn more

Fragomen news

Canadian Lawyer Magazine: Fragomen, Immigration Firm, Adds Julie Lessard as Partner in Montréal

The Montreal office has added Partner Julie Lessard and Counsel Elsa Agostinho and Sophia Khanzadian to strengthen its immigration services.

Learn more

Blog post

Housing Market Dynamics in Saudi Arabia: Policy Changes, Rent Stabilization and Cost of Living Implications for Employers

Destination Services Director Christine Sperr examines how housing market reforms, rent stabilization measures and cost-of-living dynamics in Saudi Arabia are influencing workforce mobility, compensation planning and long-term settlement strategies under Vision 2030.

Learn more

Blog post

Under EU Review: Germany’s Visa Requirements Trigger Infringement Proceedings on Vander Elst Compliance

Manager Dr Adela Schmidt and Senior Associate Isabel Schnitzler analyse the European Commission’s infringement proceedings against Germany concerning its Vander Elst visa requirements for third-country nationals providing short-term cross-border services and explain why current compliance obligations remain unchanged.

Learn more

Blog post

Venezuela’s Energy Reset: Unlocking Opportunity, Managing Risk and Deploying Talent Strategically

Latin America & the Caribbean Managing Partner Leonor Echeverria, Senior Associates Sarah Blackmore and Sonya Cole and Senior Regional Knowledge Manager Laura Weingort examine renewed energy interest in Venezuela and outline key immigration pathways, procedural constraints and strategic considerations for compliant talent deployment.

Learn more

Media mentions

Global Mobility Lawyer: EU to Leverage Visas With New “Assertive Migration Diplomacy” Strategy

Senior Manager Andreia Ghimis highlights how the EU’s new migration strategy could create opportunities for employers while increasing compliance requirements.

Learn more

Awards

Spear's 500 Recognises Partner Julia Onslow-Cole

Partner Julia Onslow-Cole is recognised in the Spears 500 guide to leading private client advisers, reflecting her experience advising high-net-worth individuals, families and global businesses on complex UK and European immigration and mobility strategies.

Learn more

Media mentions

Arabian Gulf Business Insight: Saudi Business Visa Rejections Rise as Scrutiny Tightens

Partner Abeer Al Husseini discusses increased scrutiny of Saudi business visas in AGBI, highlighting stricter review of short-term entry used for operational work and the implications for regional employers.

Learn more

Awards

Doyle’s Guide 2026: Fragomen Leaders Recognized as Leading Immigration Lawyers

Australia and New Zealand Managing Partner  Teresa Liu, Partner Charles Johanes, Practice Leaders Hedvika and Leader Ben Lear and Senior Associate Hannah Scanlan are recognized in the 2026 edition of Doyle’s Guide as leading immigration practitioners in Australia.

Learn more

Awards

Fragomen Ranked Band 1 in the Chambers Global 2026 Guide

Fragomen is ranked Band 1 for Immigration: Business in the Chambers Global 2026 Guide, marking two decades of recognition since 2006. The firm is also the only firm ranked Band 1 in the Global: Multi-Jurisdictional Immigration category and receives additional individual recognitions in the USA: Business Immigration rankings.

Learn more

Stay in touch

Subscribe to receive our latest immigration alerts

Subscribe

Our firm

  • About
  • Careers
  • Firm Governance
  • Media Inquiries
  • Recognition

Information

  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal Notices
  • Privacy Policies
  • UK Regulatory Requirements

Our firm

  • About
  • Careers
  • Firm Governance
  • Media Inquiries
  • Recognition

Information

  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal Notices
  • Privacy Policies
  • UK Regulatory Requirements

Have a question?

Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

© 2026 Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP, Fragomen Global LLP and affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that the content made available on this site is not intended for visitors / customers located in the province of Quebec, and the information provided is not applicable to the Quebec market. To access relevant information that applies to the Quebec market, please click here.