• Insights

New Policy for Military Families Sparks Debate and Confusion About U.S. Citizenship Laws

November 18, 2019

insight-news-default

Country / Territory

  • United StatesUnited States

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

In late August the Trump Administration announced it would no longer treat certain children born abroad to U.S. military personnel as “residing” in the United States, thus precluding them from acquiring U.S. citizenship automatically. The political firestorm that ensued revealed that many Americans misunderstand our citizenship laws, especially as they apply to children born outside the geographic limits of the United States and its territories.

This article examines the principal ways U.S. citizenship is acquired by birth in and outside of the United States. It also explains how children under 18 may attain citizenship after birth abroad, either automatically or by application, and how the government’s new policy impacts members of the military and their families. The process of naturalization for U.S. permanent residents over the age of 18, and the ways in which U.S. citizenship may be lost are outside the scope of this article.

Birth in the United States

The 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution and, consequently, Section 301(a) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, (8 U.S.C. 1401(a)), provide that persons born in the United States and subject to its jurisdiction are U.S. citizens at birth. Through various acts of Congress, United States today refers to the 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, and the U.S. Virgin Islands, 8 U.S.C. 1101(a)(38), as well as the Commonwealth of the Northern Mariana Islands. Public Law 94-241 蹒(c), March 24, 1976, effective Nov. 3, 1986. It also includes U.S. territorial waters and airspace. See 7 FAM 1114(b), 1115(b).

Virtually all individuals born the United States are subject to its jurisdiction and thus U.S. citizens at birth. There is a small number of foreign diplomatic officials accredited to the United States, the United Nations, and other international organizations, who are immune from U.S. jurisdiction. Where such immunity extends to the families of these foreign diplomatic officials, their children born in the United States generally are also immune from U.S. jurisdiction and are not citizens at birth. U.S. law does, however, accord these children the benefit of choosing to become U.S. permanent residents upon application and proof of continuous residence in the United States since birth, 8 CFR 101.3.

Birth Abroad

The Constitution does not specify how those born abroad may become U.S. citizens. Instead, Article 1, Section 8, Clause 4 of the Constitution delegates to Congress the responsibility to “establish a uniform rule of naturalization.”Since 1790 Congress has enacted numerous laws prescribing how U.S. citizenship may be acquired at or after birth abroad. Since these laws have generally repealed prior versions without retroactivity, evaluating a claim to citizenship requires an examination of the statute in effect at the time the claimant was born.

The current statutes prescribing who acquires U.S. citizenship upon birth abroad generally has been in effect since 1986. It provides that a child born abroad to two U.S. citizen parents is a U.S. citizen at birth so long as at least one of the parents resided in the United States before the child’s birth. If only one parent is a U.S. citizen, then that parent must have been physically present in the United States for at least five years, at least two of which are after the age of 14, prior to the child’s birth. The legal distinction between residence and physical presence is beyond the scope of this article other than to highlight that a difference exists; “residence”in the United States refers to a presence more significant and contextual than a mere physical or literal presence.

Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship After Birth Abroad Upon Residing in the United States

Children born abroad who are not U.S. citizens at birth will automatically acquire U.S. citizenship under 8 U.S.C. 1431, once they begin residing in the United States as U.S. permanent residents, provided they are under the age of 18 and in the legal and physical custody of at least one U.S. citizen parent. In this case, it is irrelevant whether the citizen parent was a U.S. citizen, or had resided or been physically present in the U.S., prior to the child’s birth. This commonly occurs when a parent with minor children naturalizes. For example:

Diego, a Mexican citizen, moves to the U.S. with his spouse and daughter, Maria, who is 11 years old. Diego has an H-1B visa and his family has H-4 visas. Diego’s U.S. employer sponsors him for U.S. permanent residency (the “green card”). The application is granted and Diego, his spouse, and Maria become U.S. permanent residents. Five years later, Diego and his spouse apply for naturalization and become U.S. citizens. Once the parents are granted citizenship, Maria, who is now 16 and residing with her parents, automatically becomes a U.S. citizen, since she is under 18. This occurs by operation of law; i.e., Maria need not apply for citizenship. The above scenario holds true even if only one of the parents chooses to naturalize, so long as Maria is living with the parent who has become a citizen.

Acquisition of U.S. Citizenship After Birth While Residing Abroad

Unlike children residing in the United States, children born and residing abroad with a U.S. citizen parent do not automatically become U.S. citizens unless the child acquires citizenship at birth. Rather, 8 U.S.C. 1433 permits a child’s U.S. citizen parent to file an application for citizenship on the child’s behalf if the citizen parent has been physically present in the United States for at least five years, at least two of which are after the age of 14. Here, physical presence does not need to have occurred prior to the child’s birth as it does when establishing citizenship at birth. While the application for citizenship may be made from abroad, the child must be in the United States to take an oath of allegiance before citizenship is granted.

Exceptions for Members of the Military and the Recent Change in Policy

The statute provides two important exceptions for members of the U.S. armed services stationed abroad. First, time the citizen parent is abroad under military orders counts as U.S. physical presence. Second, military children do not need to enter the U.S. to take the oath of allegiance; they may take the oath and be granted citizenship abroad.

In the past, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) policy conferred a third benefit to military families stationed abroad. It treated military children as if they were residing in the United States for purposes of acquiring U.S. citizenship, although no such concession appears in the statute. This permitted eligible military children to obtain U.S. citizenship automatically and obviated the need for a citizen parent to apply on their behalf or show prior periods of U.S. physical presence.

USCIS has ended that policy, applicable to children born abroad on or after Oct. 29, 2019. Members of the U.S. military stationed abroad whose children are not citizens at birth will now need to seek citizenship for their children by application and only after the parent has met the physical presence requirements.

The following example illustrates the impact in this change in policy:

Marta, a citizen of Chile and U.S. permanent resident, is employed by the U.S. Army and stationed in Germany. Marta meets and marries a German national and gives birth to a daughter, Greta. Since Greta is not born in the United States and neither of her parents are U.S. citizens, she is not a U.S. citizen at birth.

Marta subsequently naturalizes and becomes a U.S. citizen. Under prior USCIS policy, which treated military children born abroad as if they were residing in the United States, Greta would have automatically become a U.S. citizen, provided she was living with her mother.

Under current policy, however, Greta would not acquire U.S. citizenship automatically while living in Germany. While she would likely acquire it automatically upon the family’s return to the United States as U.S. residents, if Marta seeks U.S. citizenship for her daughter while residing in Germany, she will need to make an application on her behalf and may only do so once she—Marta—meets the physical presence requirements; i.e., has been physically present in the U.S., including time abroad on military orders, for at least five years, two of which are after the age of 14. Depending on when Marta came to the United States as a permanent resident, she will need to calculate the point at which she meets the five-year physical presence requirement and, as needed, how much longer she will need to accrue physical presence while serving in the military abroad before she can apply for citizenship on her daughter’s behalf.

It is unclear how many members of the military this change in policy will impact but whomever it impacts will face delay in obtaining citizenship, a new application process, and related administrative burden. Whether or not the government’s decision to reverse a long-standing policy and/or the opposition to the change is politically motivated, USCIS’s new policy position is firmly grounded in statute.

Read a brief summary of the article here. 

Reprinted with permission from the 11/14/19 edition of the “PUBLICATION”©2019 ALM Media Properties, LLC. All rights reserved.

Further duplication without permission is prohibited. ALMReprints.com – 877-257-3382 - [email protected].

 

Country / Territory

  • United StatesUnited States

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Related contacts

Porthole Headshot Image of Fragomen [WashingtonDC][Partner][AndrewGreenfield]

Andrew Greenfield

Senior Counsel

Fragomen in Washington, DC, United States

Email

[email protected]

T:+1 202 349 2183

Related offices

  • Fragomen in Washington, DC

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Share

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • LinkedIn

Explore more at Fragomen

Media mentions

Bloomberg Law: Justices’ Migrant TPS Ruling Undercuts Pending Court Challenges

Partner Daniel Pierce discussed the implications of the US Supreme Court's latest Temporary Protected Status ruling.

Learn more

Blog post

The EU Pay Transparency Directive: What Global Mobility Leaders Need to Know

In this blog, Senior Counsel Jo Antoon explores what multinational employers need to know about pay transparency, cross-border workers and mobility-related compensation differences as implementation unfolds across the EU. 

Learn more

Media mentions

The PIE: UK Unis Must Treat Compliance as “Strategic Institutional Risk”

Immigration Supervisor Sanjay Parmar discussed how recent UK Basic Compliance Assessment changes are driving universities toward more data-led, proactive compliance management.

Learn more

Blog post

UK Immigration Reforms and Their Impact on the Engineering Talent Pipeline

In this blog, Fragomen’s Nadine Barnole, Jonathan Hill, Anastasia Vasiljeva and Nicole Williams examine how higher Skilled Worker salary thresholds, rising sponsorship costs and proposed Graduate Route changes are making it harder for employers to attract and retain international engineering talent.

Learn more

Media mentions

Irish Examiner: Updates to Non-EU Work Permits Will Help Firms Fill Critical Roles

Practice Leader Colm Collins explains how Ireland's employment permit updates can help employers address workforce shortages while strengthening the country's ability to attract global talent.

Learn more

Blog post

Understanding EU-Turkey Association Rights for Workers and Families in Germany

Senior Associate Arta Djahanschiri and Associate Iris Barthel discuss how EU-Turkey Association Law, including Association Council Decision No. 1/80, can provide Turkish employees and their family members in Germany with residence and labor market rights that may extend beyond protections available under the German Residence Act.

Learn more

Media mentions

Konfederacja Lewiatan: Ekspertyza przedstawiająca skutki zmian legislacyjnych oraz ich praktyczne konsekwencje dla osób objętych ochroną czasową

Poland Immigration Strategy Director Tomasz Rogala and Senior Associate Tomasz Rdzanek explain Polish legislative changes affecting residence rights, employment authorization and long-term immigration pathways.

Learn more
Generic Insights

Media mentions

Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel: Internationale Rekrutierung ist eine Compliancefrage

Partner Marius Tollenaere and Associate Jamela Sharrock examine how employers in Germany can strengthen immigration compliance by embedding it into every stage of the employment lifecycle.

Learn more

Podcast

EB5: What Prospective Applicants Need to Know NOW!

In this episode of The Immigration Conversation, Partner Chad Blocker, Senior Counsel Mitchell Wexler and Associate Alex Kim discuss what prospective EB-5 applicants should know now, including source-of-funds documentation, project selection, concurrent filing, retrogression and upcoming program deadlines.

Learn more

Blog post

New EU Social Security Coordination Rules: What Employers Need to Know

In this blog, Partner Jo Antoons and Senior Manager Marina Ocariz discuss the EU’s provisional agreement on revised social security coordination rules and what employers should know about the expected changes to A1 certificate requirements, posted worker rules and short-term cross-border work compliance.

Learn more

Blog post

Approaching EB-5 Grandfathering Deadline: What Investors Need to Know Before September 30, 2026

In this blog, Partner Rahul Soni explains the EB-5 grandfathering provisions under the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 and why prospective investors should consider filing before the September 30, 2026 deadline to help preserve statutory protections and reduce exposure to future program uncertainty.

Learn more

Video

Do You Need a Visa for Thailand? Tourist Visa Rules Explained

In this video, Practice Leader Kate Praphakornphiphat explains the key requirements, documents, fees and processing time for a Thailand tourist visa, as well as stay duration and extension options for short-term travel. 

Learn more

Media mentions

Bloomberg Law: Justices’ Migrant TPS Ruling Undercuts Pending Court Challenges

Partner Daniel Pierce discussed the implications of the US Supreme Court's latest Temporary Protected Status ruling.

Learn more

Blog post

The EU Pay Transparency Directive: What Global Mobility Leaders Need to Know

In this blog, Senior Counsel Jo Antoon explores what multinational employers need to know about pay transparency, cross-border workers and mobility-related compensation differences as implementation unfolds across the EU. 

Learn more

Media mentions

The PIE: UK Unis Must Treat Compliance as “Strategic Institutional Risk”

Immigration Supervisor Sanjay Parmar discussed how recent UK Basic Compliance Assessment changes are driving universities toward more data-led, proactive compliance management.

Learn more

Blog post

UK Immigration Reforms and Their Impact on the Engineering Talent Pipeline

In this blog, Fragomen’s Nadine Barnole, Jonathan Hill, Anastasia Vasiljeva and Nicole Williams examine how higher Skilled Worker salary thresholds, rising sponsorship costs and proposed Graduate Route changes are making it harder for employers to attract and retain international engineering talent.

Learn more

Media mentions

Irish Examiner: Updates to Non-EU Work Permits Will Help Firms Fill Critical Roles

Practice Leader Colm Collins explains how Ireland's employment permit updates can help employers address workforce shortages while strengthening the country's ability to attract global talent.

Learn more

Blog post

Understanding EU-Turkey Association Rights for Workers and Families in Germany

Senior Associate Arta Djahanschiri and Associate Iris Barthel discuss how EU-Turkey Association Law, including Association Council Decision No. 1/80, can provide Turkish employees and their family members in Germany with residence and labor market rights that may extend beyond protections available under the German Residence Act.

Learn more

Media mentions

Konfederacja Lewiatan: Ekspertyza przedstawiająca skutki zmian legislacyjnych oraz ich praktyczne konsekwencje dla osób objętych ochroną czasową

Poland Immigration Strategy Director Tomasz Rogala and Senior Associate Tomasz Rdzanek explain Polish legislative changes affecting residence rights, employment authorization and long-term immigration pathways.

Learn more
Generic Insights

Media mentions

Deutscher AnwaltSpiegel: Internationale Rekrutierung ist eine Compliancefrage

Partner Marius Tollenaere and Associate Jamela Sharrock examine how employers in Germany can strengthen immigration compliance by embedding it into every stage of the employment lifecycle.

Learn more

Podcast

EB5: What Prospective Applicants Need to Know NOW!

In this episode of The Immigration Conversation, Partner Chad Blocker, Senior Counsel Mitchell Wexler and Associate Alex Kim discuss what prospective EB-5 applicants should know now, including source-of-funds documentation, project selection, concurrent filing, retrogression and upcoming program deadlines.

Learn more

Blog post

New EU Social Security Coordination Rules: What Employers Need to Know

In this blog, Partner Jo Antoons and Senior Manager Marina Ocariz discuss the EU’s provisional agreement on revised social security coordination rules and what employers should know about the expected changes to A1 certificate requirements, posted worker rules and short-term cross-border work compliance.

Learn more

Blog post

Approaching EB-5 Grandfathering Deadline: What Investors Need to Know Before September 30, 2026

In this blog, Partner Rahul Soni explains the EB-5 grandfathering provisions under the EB-5 Reform and Integrity Act of 2022 and why prospective investors should consider filing before the September 30, 2026 deadline to help preserve statutory protections and reduce exposure to future program uncertainty.

Learn more

Video

Do You Need a Visa for Thailand? Tourist Visa Rules Explained

In this video, Practice Leader Kate Praphakornphiphat explains the key requirements, documents, fees and processing time for a Thailand tourist visa, as well as stay duration and extension options for short-term travel. 

Learn more
Fragomen.com home
Select Language
  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German

Select Language

  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German
ContactCareersMediaClient Portal
Search Fragomen.com
  • Our Services
    For EmployersFor IndividualsBy IndustryCase Studies
  • Our Tech & Innovation
  • Our People
  • Our Insights
    Worldwide Immigration Trends ReportsMagellan SeriesImmigration AlertsEventsMedia MentionsFragomen NewsBlogsPodcasts & Videos
  • Spotlights
    Travel and Mobility Considerations: Situation in the Middle EastNavigating Immigration Under the Second Trump AdministrationImmigration Matters: Your U.S. Compliance RoadmapCenter for Strategy and Applied InsightsVietnamese ImmigrationView More
  • About Us
    About FragomenOfficesResponsible Business PracticesFirm GovernanceRecognition

Our Services

  • For Employers
  • For Individuals
  • By Industry
  • Case Studies

Our Tech & Innovation

  • Our Approach

Our People

  • Overview / Directory

Our Insights

  • Worldwide Immigration Trends Reports
  • Magellan Series
  • Immigration Alerts
  • Events
  • Media Mentions
  • Fragomen News
  • Blogs
  • Podcasts & Videos

Spotlights

  • Travel and Mobility Considerations: Situation in the Middle East
  • Navigating Immigration Under the Second Trump Administration
  • Immigration Matters: Your U.S. Compliance Roadmap
  • Center for Strategy and Applied Insights
  • Vietnamese Immigration
  • View More

About Us

  • About Fragomen
  • Offices
  • Responsible Business Practices
  • Firm Governance
  • Recognition
Select Language
  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German

Select Language

  • English
  • French
  • French - Canadian
  • German
ContactCareersMediaClient Portal
Important Updates
Important Updates
June 30, 2026 | New ZealandNew Zealand: Major Changes Announced for Skilled Migrant Category Resident Visa
July 1, 2026 | United StatesBloomberg Law: Justices’ Migrant TPS Ruling Undercuts Pending Court Challenges
July 1, 2026 | United KingdomThe PIE: UK Unis Must Treat Compliance as “Strategic Institutional Risk”
June 30, 2026 | 🌐Middle East - The Latest News on Mobility and Travel Considerations
June 30, 2026 | New ZealandNew Zealand: In-Person English Language Testing Requirement Implemented
June 30, 2026 | New ZealandNew Zealand: Major Changes Announced for Skilled Migrant Category Resident Visa
July 1, 2026 | United StatesBloomberg Law: Justices’ Migrant TPS Ruling Undercuts Pending Court Challenges
July 1, 2026 | United KingdomThe PIE: UK Unis Must Treat Compliance as “Strategic Institutional Risk”
June 30, 2026 | 🌐Middle East - The Latest News on Mobility and Travel Considerations
June 30, 2026 | New ZealandNew Zealand: In-Person English Language Testing Requirement Implemented
June 30, 2026 | New ZealandNew Zealand: Major Changes Announced for Skilled Migrant Category Resident Visa
Subscribe

Stay in touch

Subscribe to receive our latest immigration alerts

Subscribe

Our firm

  • About
  • Careers
  • Firm Governance
  • Media Inquiries
  • Recognition

Information

  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal Notices
  • Privacy Policies
  • AI Transparency Statement
  • UK Regulatory Requirements

Our firm

  • About
  • Careers
  • Firm Governance
  • Media Inquiries
  • Recognition

Information

  • Attorney Advertising
  • Legal Notices
  • Privacy Policies
  • AI Transparency Statement
  • UK Regulatory Requirements

Have a question?

Contact Us
  • LinkedIn
  • Youtube
  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • TikTok
  • Twitter

© 2026 Fragomen, Del Rey, Bernsen & Loewy, LLP, Fragomen Global LLP and affiliates. All Rights Reserved.

Please note that the content made available on this site is not intended for visitors / customers located in the province of Quebec, and the information provided is not applicable to the Quebec market. To access relevant information that applies to the Quebec market, please click here.