Second Circuit Allows DHS to Implement Public Charge Rule in All States Except Vermont, Connecticut, and New York
August 12, 2020

At a Glance
- The Second Circuit Court of Appeals has limited a lower court nationwide injunction on the DHS public charge rule; the rule is now barred only in Vermont, Connecticut, and New York.
- While the limited injunction is in effect, DHS may implement its public charge rule in all other U.S. states and the District of Columbia.
- The agency has not yet issued guidance on how it will implement differing public charge standards across U.S. states.
- Today’s decision does not affect the court order barring implementation of the Department of State public charge rule, which is enjoined in a separate lawsuit.
The issue
The Department of Homeland Security will be permitted to implement its public charge rule in all U.S. states except for Vermont, Connecticut, and New York, pursuant to a Second Circuit Court of Appeals order issued today. The Second Circuit limited the nationwide injunction issued by a lower court on July 29 to these three states only. The case is NY et al. v. DHS.
In Vermont, Connecticut, and New York, DHS must continue to apply the public charge guidance that was in place before the public charge rule effective date of February 24, 2020.
The rule significantly increases the burden on foreign nationals to establish that they will not become a “public charge” of the U.S. government in adjustment of status applications, and in nonimmigrant extension of stay and change of status requests.
Today’s decision does not affect the court order barring implementation of the Department of State public charge rule, which is enjoined in a separate lawsuit.
What’s next
DHS is expected to issue guidance regarding the filing of immigration applications impacted by the new limited injunction. It is expected that these applications must again adhere to the new public charge regulation form and documentation requirements.
This alert is for informational purposes only. If you have any questions, please contact the immigration professional with whom you work at Fragomen.
Explore more at Fragomen
Media mentions
Partner Bo Cooper explains the impact of wage‑weighted selection on H‑1B registration and compliance.
Media mentions
Partner K. Edward Raleigh highlights how recent H-1B changes are shaping employer compliance strategies.
Media mentions
Practice Leader Colm Collins explains that processing delays, shifting demand in information and communication technology (ICT) and renewal cycles contributed to last year’s drop in work permit approvals.
Media mentions
Partner Rick Lamanna examines current pressures on Canada’s immigration system, including processing delays, reduced admissions and policy uncertainty and the implications for applicants and employers.
Blog post
Manager Mihaela Dumitru outlines how Swiss authorities assess Employer of Record and body-leasing models, highlighting key compliance risks, licensing requirements and a regulatory update affecting EU and EFTA nationals effective 1 January 2026.

Media mentions
Partner Karolina Schiffter discusses how courts in Poland are reinforcing timely processing and constitutional protections for foreigners.
Blog post
Immigration Manager Alice Heron examines Ireland’s updated employment permit salary thresholds taking effect in March 2026, including the reintroduction of graduate-specific Minimum Annual Remuneration bands and what these changes mean for employers planning graduate recruitment in 2026 and 2027.
Media mentions
Partner Jill Bloom explains how the new wage-based H-1B selection rule may influence hiring decisions and prompt employers to reassess workforce planning and explore alternative visa options.
Media mentions
Partner K. Edward Raleigh discusses how companies are rethinking their H-1B strategies amid evolving policies.
Media mentions
Partner Bo Cooper explains the impact of wage‑weighted selection on H‑1B registration and compliance.
Media mentions
Partner K. Edward Raleigh highlights how recent H-1B changes are shaping employer compliance strategies.
Media mentions
Practice Leader Colm Collins explains that processing delays, shifting demand in information and communication technology (ICT) and renewal cycles contributed to last year’s drop in work permit approvals.
Media mentions
Partner Rick Lamanna examines current pressures on Canada’s immigration system, including processing delays, reduced admissions and policy uncertainty and the implications for applicants and employers.
Blog post
Manager Mihaela Dumitru outlines how Swiss authorities assess Employer of Record and body-leasing models, highlighting key compliance risks, licensing requirements and a regulatory update affecting EU and EFTA nationals effective 1 January 2026.

Media mentions
Partner Karolina Schiffter discusses how courts in Poland are reinforcing timely processing and constitutional protections for foreigners.
Blog post
Immigration Manager Alice Heron examines Ireland’s updated employment permit salary thresholds taking effect in March 2026, including the reintroduction of graduate-specific Minimum Annual Remuneration bands and what these changes mean for employers planning graduate recruitment in 2026 and 2027.
Media mentions
Partner Jill Bloom explains how the new wage-based H-1B selection rule may influence hiring decisions and prompt employers to reassess workforce planning and explore alternative visa options.
Media mentions
Partner K. Edward Raleigh discusses how companies are rethinking their H-1B strategies amid evolving policies.



